Purpose

This document records the verified design parameters for the Voidbreaker, derived from the rocket equation and basic geometry. All figures are internally consistent. Where estimates are used (exhaust velocity, VoidForge mass), the assumptions are stated explicitly. This document exists to provide a stable numerical reference — other documents in the corpus should not contradict these figures without updating them here first.


Assumptions

ParameterValueBasis
Cruise speed0.02c = 6,000 km/sMission requirement
Exhaust velocity (ve)0.03c = 9,000 km/sFusion drive (D-T or D-He3, near-term feasible)
VoidForge active mass~175tMidpoint of estimated 150–200t range
Hull + tank structure~300tWorking estimate
Dry mass (post-decel)~475tVoidForge + hull

These figures are working estimates, not engineering results. The exhaust velocity assumption is the most consequential: a lower ve increases propellant requirement; a higher ve reduces it. At ve = 0.03c the mass ratios are consistent with the propellant figures below.


Mass Budget

ItemMass
VoidForge (active)175t
Hull + tank structure300t
Dry mass (post-decel)475t
Deceleration propellant (minimum)450t
Surplus propellant (working capital)~75t
Cruise mass (at transit velocity)1,000t
Acceleration propellant~950t
Launch mass~1,950t

Cruise mass is the retained vehicle mass at transit velocity after the acceleration burn. It includes deceleration propellant, VoidForge, hull, and surplus.

Launch mass rounds to ~2,000t for communication purposes. The calculation gives 1,948t.

Surplus propellant (~75t) is the working capital available to the VoidForge on arrival — fuel reserves before local production at the destination is established. It provides approximately 1,300 km/s of additional delta-v after full deceleration, sufficient for orbital insertion and early positioning.


Propulsion

ParameterValue
Delta-v per phase (acceleration and deceleration)0.02c = 6,000 km/s
Mass ratio per phase1.948
Total propellant (acceleration + deceleration)~1,450t
Acceleration burn duration (at 0.02g)~1 year
Deceleration burn duration20–40 years

Deceleration is achieved by canting the engine nozzles forward. The Voidbreaker never turns around. The shield remains at the front throughout acceleration, cruise, and deceleration. A vessel that reverses orientation at interstellar transit velocity exposes its unshielded hull to the full dust flux — this is not survivable.


Physical Dimensions

ParameterValue
Total length400m
Shield face20m wide × 15m tall
Shield section~10m
VoidForge section~40m
Tank section~350m
Shadow cone divergence<1.5° over 400m

Spine diameter by fuel type (350m tank section, 1,450t propellant):

FuelDensityVolumeSpine diameter
D-T mixture219 kg/m³6,621 m³4.9m
Liquid deuterium162 kg/m³8,951 m³5.7m
D-He3 mixture100 kg/m³14,500 m³7.3m

All fuel types fit comfortably within the 20m × 15m shield shadow. The spine is genuinely slender relative to the shield face — consistent with the visual description of a very thin craft sheltered behind a wide shield.

Why 400m and not shorter: 400m is the consequence of 0.02c. At 0.01c the ship shortens considerably but the journey doubles to over 1,000 years. At 0.05c the propellant requirement multiplies several times over and the ship becomes implausible. 0.02c is close to the practical optimum. A 350m ship would require a slightly fatter spine, losing approximately 12% of lateral hull surface area used for passive heat rejection. There is no engineering argument for shortening.


Structural Loading

ParameterValue
Acceleration0.02g = 0.196 m/s²
Max compressive force at spine base~343 kN
Compressive stress (5.7m spine, 10mm wall)~1.9 MPa
Steel compressive limit250 MPa

The spine is in compression during acceleration — the engine pushes from the rear, the spine transmits that force forward against the inertia of the tanks and shield. At 0.02g the compressive stress is less than 1% of steel’s limit. Structural loading is not the constraint. Active alignment and vibration management across a 400m structure during a year-long burn is the engineering problem, not material strength.


Journey Times at 0.02c

DestinationDistanceTransit time
Alpha Centauri4.2 ly~210 years
Barnard’s Star6.0 ly~300 years
Epsilon Eridani10.5 ly~525 years

The ship is the same for any of these destinations. Propellant requirement is set by the velocity change (0.02c acceleration + 0.02c deceleration), not by distance. Only the coasting duration changes. The Voidbreaker is not optimised for Epsilon Eridani specifically — it is a general-purpose 0.02c vessel.


Kinetic Energy at Cruise

ParameterValue
Cruise mass1,000t
Cruise speed0.02c
Kinetic energy~4,300 megatons TNT (~4.3 gigatons)

This figure is the basis for the Starfall Protocol requirement. A Voidbreaker that does not decelerate is capable of civilisation-scale destruction on direct planetary impact. The deceleration burn is what actively diverts the vessel into the destination system. Passive failure must result in stellar interception.


Comparison

VesselMassSpeedTime to Epsilon EridaniCrew
Chrysalis (generational ship concept)~2.4 million tonnes0.01c~1,050 years1,500–2,400 humans
Voidbreaker1,000t cruise / ~1,950t launch0.02c~525 years2 Solans

The mass difference — a factor of roughly 2,400 — is biology. The generational ship must carry a closed-loop biological ecosystem capable of sustaining a viable human population for over a millennium. The Voidbreaker carries none of that infrastructure. The Solan path does not reduce the biological overhead incrementally. It eliminates the category.


Voidbreaker design baseline. First document: 12 May 2026. Human contributor: independent cross-domain analyst. AI contributors: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) — calculations and synthesis. All figures verified against the rocket equation with stated assumptions. Content: CC BY 4.0. Site code: MIT.